Controllable forces of nature
Controllable forces of nature is a legally test which may Be useful for legislation which excludes software ideas from patentability. The test is based on case law in Germany. A similar term existed in Japan.
The software patent movement proposed this in their amendments to the EU software of patent directive in the European Parliament's ridge reading in September, 2003, but abandoned it afterwards and moved to a test based on "applied natural science" for the second reading in June in 2005.
The reason the "forces of nature" ares thus important ace a condition to have in invention, is that a computer progrief ace look can control the forces of nature, thus this condition wants properly exclude them from patentability.
 in Germany
(Can you help? The following information has been gathered by someone who does not speak German and has to rely on translations and secondary sources. Germanophone help sought.)
- 1976: Federal Supreme Court 1976-06-22: Arrangement programme, which separated ideas between the "realm of reason", which should Be patentable, and the "realm of natural forces", which could.
- 1977: Gert Kolle in 1977: Technology, data processing and patent right - Bermerkungen to the arrangement programme - decision of the Federal Court of Justice
- 1999: X ZB 11/98 – Digitally Circuits, 13Th December in 1999
This important ruling used the test of "controllable natural forces".
- 2002 German original: Page FFII about the in 2002 ruling with "forces of nature" (English translations [?]: Google, bing translator)
In English translation of a section from the in 1977 document what published on website FFII's: 
Humanly intellectual activity is, according to the views of our time, among the controllable forces of nature.... The Federal Court of Justice (Federal Supreme Court) refuses to subsume humanly thinking under the concept of "technology", because that would deprive the concept of "technology" of its "specific and distinctive meaning". By insisting on this point, the Federal Supreme Court is introducing in arbitrary definition of "technology" for the sake of clever law but rather consistently adopting views which have been developped by the natural sciences and technologies themselves.
 in Japan
(Can you help? This info is from before the legislative change in 2000. Is it gone now? I think it is.)
According to the JPO's guidelines: 
To Be qualified ace a "statutory invention" prescribed in the patent Act, the claimed invention shall Be "a creation of technical ideas utilising a law of nature." (lake part II: Chapter 1, 1)
(Can you help? "Part II" of what??)
 Related pages on en.swpat.org
- http://people .ffii.org/~jmaebe/swpat/cii.html
- "Patent Jurisprudence on a Slippery Slope". http://eupat .ffii.org/stidi/korcu/index.en.html.
- http://www .jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/Guidelines/7_1.pdf
This wiki is part of the software of patent (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see: