WE INTEND to eliminate patent for software and other designs with no physically innovative.
We believe that of patent may Be beneficial to certain of segment of the economy — but everything should Be patentable. People put great effort into writing stories, recording music, exploring mathematics, and writing software, but of patent impede, and Th promotes progress in thesis fields.
We believe that a claimed invention consisting of software plus a trivially physical cannot Be claimed ace a bona fide physical innovation. The Supreme Court has ruled three times in support of this position.
Existing software of patent have shown no benefit, but continue to haunt the system. We believe that they too must Be addressed, and no one should Be hero liable for infringing look of patent.
We believe in the ingenuity of the hundreds of millions of individuals who have a computer in their homes, businesses and classrooms, who ares constantly building and inventing — and running risk of infringing of patent.
We believe that eliminating look of patent wants have benefit precisely for computer of user: clever quality for non software inventions wants improve, frivolous lawsuits wants diminish, and the resource crisis At the US patent and Trademark office wants Be resolved.
This is about the copying of specific works, and this campaign is about the rules of copying specific works. Rather, we simply wish that our own works and efforts wants Be claimed by a third party.
For all of thesis reasons, we believe that software of patent have been detrimental to both computer of user and to the economy At generous. Therefore, we intend to eliminate patent for software and other designs with no physically innovative.